Preprint 2026 Plug-and-play Image Restoration

LEADer

Local Epistemic Uncertainty Guided Active Sampling for Plug-and-play Diffusive Image Restoration

LEADer uses local epistemic uncertainty to actively control both where a diffusion prior should intervene and when redundant sampling steps can be skipped.

Jiaqi Zhang*, Zheng Pang*, Rongrong Gao, Qiyuan Zhang, Yang Yang

Jiangsu University | Xi'an University of Technology

* Equal contribution. † Corresponding author.

LEADer architecture overview
Architecture overview: uncertainty-calibrated prior modulation and state-aware trajectory pruning.
Spatial Control Pixel-wise uncertainty

Adapts null-space prior strength to preserve reliable details and suppress uncertain artifacts.

Temporal Control Active trajectory pruning

Uses uncertainty trace to skip stationary sampling phases while keeping bounded error.

Integration Plug-and-play

Improves multiple DMIR baselines without retraining and with negligible memory overhead.

Abstract

Uncertainty turns diffusion restoration from fixed sampling into active sampling.

Diffusion model-based image restoration methods usually rely on fixed data constraints and uniform step sizes, which can create spatial distortions, lose fine details, and introduce redundant computation. LEADer addresses these limitations through a Local Epistemic Uncertainty Guided Active Sampling framework.

In the spatial domain, LEADer uses pixel-wise uncertainty to dynamically modulate prior strength in the null space. In the temporal domain, it quantifies sampling stability through uncertainty trace and adaptively prunes the denoising trajectory. The framework maintains strict data consistency, provides a deterministic skip-sampling error bound, and can be integrated into existing DMIR methods.

Method

LEADer couples local reliability with diffusion sampling decisions.

01

Estimate local epistemic uncertainty

At each reverse step, LEADer estimates a local uncertainty map that reveals where the current restoration state is reliable or ambiguous.

02

Modulate the null-space prior

Uncertainty-Calibrated Prior Modulation adjusts the prior contribution region by region, balancing data fidelity and generative detail.

03

Prune redundant timesteps

State-Aware Trajectory Pruning monitors uncertainty trace and selects an adaptive step size when the process becomes stable.

Detailed LEADer method pipeline
LEADer converts uncertainty into two active controls: spatial prior modulation and temporal trajectory pruning.

Results

Higher restoration quality with faster sampling.

DDNM + LEADer +2.382%

Avg. PSNR

DDNM + LEADer -12.781%

Avg. LPIPS

ProjDiff + LEADer -8.421%

Avg. Time

DDPG + LEADer +1.197%

Avg. PSNR

Table 1 Extract

Average gains on CelebA-HQ 1K across five restoration tasks

Baseline PSNR LPIPS Time
DDNM + LEADer +2.382% -12.781% -5.747%
DDPG + LEADer +1.197% -7.137% -6.662%
ProjDiff + LEADer +0.882% -7.330% -8.421%
PIRP + LEADer +0.934% -7.618% -5.824%
Table 1 quantitative results for LEADer across image restoration tasks
Full Table 1 cropped from the paper: quantitative results on CelebA-HQ 1K and ImageNet 1K.
Qualitative and quantitative comparison of LEADer
Qualitative and quantitative comparison across image restoration tasks.

Visual Comparison

Cleaner local structures across restoration degradations.

Visual comparison across image restoration tasks
LEADer improves detail preservation while reducing artifacts in challenging degraded regions.

Ablation

UCPM and SATP provide complementary gains.

The ablation tables show that uncertainty-calibrated prior modulation improves restoration quality, while state-aware trajectory pruning reduces sampling time. Their combination gives the strongest balance of fidelity and efficiency.

Ablation study and hyperparameter sensitivity tables for LEADer
Tables 2 and 3 cropped from the paper.

Efficiency

State-aware pruning removes redundant reverse steps.

Sampling trajectory comparison
Adaptive trajectory pruning shortens the denoising path.
PSNR LPIPS and time over sampling steps
Quality and time trends under different sampling steps.

Citation

BibTeX

@article{zhang2026leader,
  title={Local Epistemic Uncertainty Guided Active Sampling for Plug-and-play Diffusive Image Restoration},
  author={Zhang, Jiaqi and Pang, Zheng and Gao, Rongrong and Zhang, Qiyuan and Yang, Yang},
  year={2026}
}